What should the approach to NLW include according to best practices?

The approach to Nonlethal Weapons (NLW) should include employing a combination of NLW and lethal options, as this promotes a more flexible and adaptable strategy in various scenarios. Utilizing both types of weapons allows forces to respond proportionately to a given situation, prioritizing de-escalation when possible while maintaining the capacity to apply lethal force if necessary for self-defense or mission success.

This method is aligned with the principles of use-of-force continuum, which emphasizes the necessity of using the least amount of force required to achieve a desired outcome. By incorporating both NLW and lethal options, personnel can effectively manage threats while minimizing risk to civilian lives and property. This balance is essential for maintaining operational effectiveness and achieving long-term objectives without escalating violence unnecessarily.

In the context of best practices, relying only on vocal commands limits options during high-stress encounters where immediate action may be warranted. Favoring distance over strategy may prevent personnel from effectively controlling a situation, and waiting for superior forces can lead to missed opportunities to intervene decisively. Thus, combining NLW with lethal capabilities supports a comprehensive and effective approach to conflict resolution.